Mogadishu, SOMALIA – In Somali federal politics, the Federal Government of Somalia’s (FGS) strategic misrepresentation of Puntland’s involvement in the decision-making process stands out as a particularly egregious example of governance malpractice. Central to this deception is the FGS’s portrayal of unity and consensus with the Federal Member States (FMS), specifically Puntland, in engagements that are crucial for Somalia’s future. This analysis aims to shed light on the implications of such deceptive practices, emphasizing the urgent need for transparency and integrity in the governance of Somalia.
The Illusion of Inclusivity
The crux of the issue lies in the FGS’s deliberate use of Puntland’s logo in official documents and meetings, suggesting Puntland’s participation and agreement where none exists. This tactic is not merely an internal matter but is primarily aimed at international audiences, including donors, international organizations, and partners like the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The objective is clear: to project an image of cohesive governance and reform progress, thereby securing international support and funding under false pretenses.
This strategy was starkly evident in recent developments, including the announcement of unified tax collection reforms and fisheries management meetings. In both instances, Puntland’s logo was prominently displayed, falsely indicating its involvement and endorsement. Yet, the absence of Puntland’s actual consent—underscored by the lack of a signature from its minister on the so-called unified agreement—reveals the depth of the FGS’s deception.
This manipulative portrayal of consensus has profound implications for the fabric of Somali federalism. First and foremost, it undermines the trust and cooperation essential for effective federal governance. By sidelining Puntland and fabricating its endorsement, the FGS not only disrespects Puntland’s autonomy but also jeopardizes the principles of mutual respect and dialogue that underpin the federal arrangement.
Furthermore, the FGS’s actions threaten to destabilize the delicate balance of power and resource sharing that is critical for maintaining unity among Somalia’s diverse regions. The international community’s perception of Somali governance is crucial, and by misleading these external stakeholders, the FGS risks alienating key partners and undermining efforts towards sustainable development and governance.
Breaking Trust: Puntland’s Formal Severance from the FGS
Since January 2023, Puntland has not maintained formal relations with the FGS, marking a significant rupture in the Somali federal framework. This severance was prompted by deep-rooted issues related to constitutional discord, disagreements over resource sharing, and disputes regarding power allocation. The breakdown in relations underscores the critical nature of these disputes and the challenges they pose to the unity and governance of Somalia.
Puntland opposes FGS’s predilection to enact national bills without due consultative processes, a move it argues contravenes both the Provisional Federal Constitution of Somalia and the Constitution of Puntland. This lack of consultation and disregard for established legal frameworks not only exacerbates the division between Puntland and the FGS but also signals a broader issue of governance malpractice within the FGS, further emphasizing the urgent need for a shift towards more transparent and accountable governance practices.
Need for Transparency and Accountability
Addressing the deceptive practices of the FGS is paramount for restoring trust and credibility within Somalia’s federal system. The path forward requires a commitment to transparency, accountability, and genuine dialogue. The FGS must engage in open and honest consultations with all FMS, respecting their concerns and contributions to national governance.
Equally important is the role of the international community. International partners must exercise due diligence, seeking verifiable evidence of consensus and genuine participation from all FMS before extending their support. Their engagement can serve as a catalyst for change, encouraging adherence to the principles of federalism and collaborative governance.
The FGS’s misrepresentation of Puntland’s involvement in key governance processes highlights a critical challenge facing Somali federalism. To move beyond this impasse, the FGS must abandon its deceptive tactics in favor of a governance approach that values integrity, inclusivity, and cooperation. Only through a concerted effort to rebuild trust and engage in transparent dialogue can Somalia hope to achieve the stability, unity, and prosperity that its citizens deserve.
