Dhuusamareb, SOMALIA – In a scathing critique that has brought the weapons proliferation in Somalia into sharp focus, Moalim Mohamud Sheikh Hassan, the leader of Ahlu Sunna wal Jama (ASWJ), has called out the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) for its contradictory stance on the recent weapons seizure in Abudwaaq. This intervention by a prominent Sufi militia leader has added a new dimension to the ongoing debate surrounding Somalia’s weapons management and the government’s credibility in handling security matters.
The weapons accountability crisis in Somalia reached a new peak following the incident in Abudwaaq, where locals intercepted and seized a large cache of weapons from two trucks allegedly under the protection of the National Intelligence and Security Agency (NISA). This event has become a flashpoint in the broader discussion about arms proliferation and government transparency in Somalia.
The FGS’s initial response to the incident was to distance itself from the weapons shipment, suggesting that the arms were being smuggled by criminal gangs. However, in a move that has intensified the weapons accountability crisis in Somalia, the government simultaneously demanded the return of these weapons to state custody and denied responsibility for the weapons. This apparent contradiction has not gone unnoticed, and ASWJ’s leader has seized upon it to challenge the government’s narrative and credibility.
Government Hypocrisy
Moalim Mohamud Sheikh Hassan’s statement cuts to the heart of Somalia’s weapons accountability crisis. By pointing out the logical inconsistency in the government’s position, he has exposed a fundamental flaw in the FGS’s handling of the situation. “It is unacceptable for the government to demand the return of weapons it has disavowed,” Hassan stated, highlighting the absurdity of claiming no ownership while simultaneously asserting a right to reclaim the weapons. The ASWJ leader’s intervention brings to the forefront concerns about the FGS’s ability to maintain credibility in its security operations and communications.
The government’s contradictory stance on the Abudwaaq weapons raises questions about its truthfulness in other matters of national security. If the FGS is willing to publicly disavow ownership of weapons while privately seeking their return, what other inconsistencies might exist in its security policies and practices?
This credibility gap is particularly damaging in the context of Somalia’s ongoing struggle against Al-Shabab and other extremist groups. The Somalia weapons accountability crisis undermines public trust in the government’s ability to manage security threats effectively. It also provides ammunition to critics who question the wisdom of lifting the arms embargo on Somalia, given the apparent lack of transparent and consistent weapons management protocols.
